Dog Attack Lawyer Attorney for your Need 2024
It is possible for anyone to get Dog Attack; however, children are the ones who are most prone to suffer severe bites to the face and neck. Scarring, disfigurement, and fear that lasts a lifetime are some of the long-term potential outcomes that might result from a dog attack on either an adult or a child. As a result of being bitten by a dog, victims should educate themselves on the legal alternatives and rights available to them.
Dog bites can occur from a variety of breeds, including but not limited to the following: Pit Bull Dog Bites, Chow Chow Dog Bites, Rottweiler Dog Bites, Staffordshire Terrier Dog Bites, German Shepherd Dog Bites, Siberian Husky Dog Bites, and more.
Lawyers that are both knowledgeable and experienced Dog Attack
Our personal injury attorneys at Swor & Gatto, P.A. in St. Paul have been providing assistance to clients since 1981. Among the clients they have assisted are those who have been Dog Attack. The knowledge and experience that we possess allow us to examine cases in a timely manner. The ability to decide the course of action that will result in the highest possible compensation and damages is made possible by this.
Expensiveness of a Dog Attack
Not only can dogs sustain injuries from bites, but they can also sustain injuries from being knocked down and scratched, which can lead to head injuries, infections, and the loss of the ability to use limbs. Any injury caused by a dog bite can have a major financial impact. In addition to psychological counseling, victims may require reconstructive surgery, treatment for infections, and medical care.
Laws in Minnesota Regarding Dog Attack
State law in Minnesota is known as “strict liability.” Regardless of whether or not there was a provocation, this indicates that dog owners are accountable for injuries that are caused by their household pets. Even if a child clutches a dog or frightens it by yelling, for instance, the owner is nonetheless responsible for the injuries that the child sustains as a result of the dog’s actions.
Nevertheless, the majority of dog bites are arbitrary, meaning that the victim is attacked for no apparent reason. The injured party is eligible to get compensation for past and future medical expenditures, lost income, pain and suffering, and other expenses, regardless of the circumstances surrounding the injury suffered.
Please get in touch with our Dog Attack attorneys
To learn more about the ways in which the attorneys at Swor & Gatto in St. Paul can assist you following a dog bite, we encourage you to schedule a free consultation. Get in touch with us at the number 651-454-3600 or fill out our intake form right away. We will come to visit you at your home or in the hospital if you are unable to see us in person.
What is the frequency of Dog Attack
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, more than 4.7 million people in the United States are bitten by dogs each year. A little under 800,000 of people will seek medical attention and treatment. There are around 400,000 people who will require emergency treatment after being bitten, and children make up half of those who are bitten.
A few more data regarding dog bites are as follows, for your consideration:
A male dog is responsible for approximately 92% of all dog attacks, and almost invariably, it is a male dog that has not been neutered.
Roughly twenty-five percent of dogs that attack are chained.
Every year, the insurance sector pays out more than one billion dollars to settle claims related to dog bites.
It is estimated that around three-quarters of all dog bites occur on the extremities, which include the arms, hands, legs, and feet.
It is estimated that approximately 75% of dog bites take place on the property of the victim, and the majority of those victims are familiar with the dog that attacks them.
Which laws govern Dog Attack in the state of Minnesota?
The laws in Minnesota strongly favour the individual who has been hurt by a dog bite. In the state of Minnesota, the owner of a dog is nonetheless responsible for any harm that the dog causes, regardless of whether the dog is on a leash or in a fenced yard.
In addition, the legislation in Minnesota permits a victim to receive compensation not just for the original dog bite but also for any lingering illness or injury. Our laws against dog bites apply not just to the owner of the dog but also to anyone who may have been observing, strolling, pet-sitting, or boarding the dog at the time of the incident. Such a distinction is quite important in the courtroom.
Specifically, the following is what Minnesota Statute 347.22 had to say concerning circumstances in which the owner was liable:
Is Minnesota a small state or a big state?
The one-bite rule is not followed in Minnesota, contrary to rumours. In accordance with the one-bite rule, dog owners are only held accountable if they are aware that their dog is aggressive.
A dog bite that was provoked is handled differently in Minnesota.
In situations where a dog assaults a human, the rights of the human are prioritized over the rights of the dog. The legal system, on the other hand, acknowledges that an animal cannot be held accountable for acting on its impulses because it does not possess the higher functions that characterize humans.
In the state of Minnesota, the only defense that a Dog Attack owner can raise is that the dog bite was a result of the owner’s own actions. Although this may indicate that the person is hurting or attacking the dog, it is not always the case. It is a straightforward statement that people act in a manner that provokes the dog to bite in order to protect itself.
Therefore, despite the fact that a dog bite is a serious injury, it is essential to make certain that the sufferer did not intentionally provoke the Dog Attack. Remember that in order for an action to be considered provocative, it is not always necessary for it to be deliberate. Stepping on a dog by accident could result in a dog bite that was provoked, in which case the victim faces the possibility of losing the case.
It is possible that the person who was bitten is at fault if they handle a dog that has an injury in such a way that the dog feels pain and makes an instinctive response. This can be demonstrated in a few different ways:
Despite being aware that the dog was in Dog Attack, the individual continued to behave in an unacceptable manner. This is especially true in the event where the owner had previously informed the individual in question about the dog’s ailment, and the dog has responded defensively even though it has not bitten anyone.
The dog was protecting itself from being intentionally injured (for example, if someone was hitting it as a kind of discipline) or from being intentionally put in Dog Attack (for example, if someone tried to sit on the dog). By doing so, the dog was able to protect itself. When this occurs, you have the ability to demonstrate that the person’s “accidental” maltreatment was actually intentional.
In most cases, this necessitates providing evidence that the individual was frequently cautioned about the dog’s discomfort, but either chose to disregard the warnings or chose to Dog Attack them on purpose.